British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum

Recent Books by Forum Members

   

Go Back   British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum > Common Forums > Reproductions, Restrikes, Fakes, Forgeries, and Copies

 Other Pages: Galleries, Links etc.
Glossary  Books by Forum Members     Canadian Pre 1914    CEF    CEF Badge Inscriptions   Canadian post 1920     Canadian post 1953     British Cavalry Badges     Makers' Marks    Pipers' Badges  Canadian Cloth Titles  Books  SEARCH
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 27-02-13, 12:40 PM
billy's Avatar
billy billy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Carterton (RAF Brize-Norton) Oxfordshire
Posts: 2,599
Default 6th City of London & British Asian

Hi have picked up these two badges from same bloke but what do you think? at first I was sceptical but have since grown on me, just looking for clarification as to good or bad! the flashing on the 6th City of London R,gt, doesn,t look nice but old yes, some of the lettering well don,t look nice, what do you think?
The British Asian has nice colouring but never seen one up close so have no reference points to know, looks old? but not really a judgement is it! cheers billy
Attached Images
File Type: jpg P1020047.jpg (86.0 KB, 63 views)
File Type: jpg P1020048.jpg (95.8 KB, 53 views)
File Type: jpg P1020049.jpg (55.1 KB, 32 views)
File Type: jpg P1020050.jpg (89.3 KB, 67 views)
File Type: jpg P1020051.jpg (86.5 KB, 45 views)
File Type: jpg P1020052.jpg (52.4 KB, 28 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 27-02-13, 02:24 PM
Rockape's Avatar
Rockape Rockape is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 876
Default

Hi Billy,

I can comment on the British African Sqn, King's Colonials. Please look at the photos attached. The red marks indicate the difference between the badge I have (believed to be correct) and the badge you have shown. I believe that they were manufactured in yellow brass for OR's or gilt for officers (although this view is opposed by another forum member). The collection housed in the NAM has the badges in these metals.

The major differences in your badge is 1. The trunk should be voided at the tip where it curls back up; 2. The ridge at the front of the ear; 3. The ear lobe; 4. The detail in the vegetation and 5. The loop positions at the rear.

Garry
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_0238 edit.jpg (88.3 KB, 59 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0246.jpg (84.9 KB, 36 views)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 27-02-13, 09:53 PM
Fatherofthree's Avatar
Fatherofthree Fatherofthree is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 1,663
Default

Good evening Billy.

Not over enthusiastic about The 6th London.

Front:
O in South Africa is a bit wonky.
No spacing between 0 - 0 of 1900 - 02.
Poor definition of DIRIGE.
Spacing between the letters of LONDON are not equal.

Rear:
Slider is too high in my opinion, however, that may just be the way some badges were made.
Doesn't appear to be much depth in the strike of the centre circlet.

However, that doesn't mean it's a wrong 'un, solely my opinion based on comparisons to those I have and those I have seen.

Regards
Brian
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 28-02-13, 07:08 AM
billy's Avatar
billy billy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Carterton (RAF Brize-Norton) Oxfordshire
Posts: 2,599
Default

Thanks lads will keep my eyes open for a 6th wiil place them with the other copies thanks very much for you help! billy
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

mhs link

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:30 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.